766-775 HDW  2f Pace Fig
 776-785 HDW  4f Pace Fig
 786-795 HDW  6f Pace Fig
 796-805 HDW  8f Pace Fig
 806-815 HDW 10f Pace Fig
 816-825 HDW Late Pace Fig
 846-855 HDW Final Time Speed Rating

Here's a link to an older thread that has the two charts for points of call:
http://www.jcapper.com/messageboard/TopicReader.asp?topic=2004&forum=General

The first chart is labeled Fractional Times and shows the points of call that Equibase used at one time for timing the race leader for purposes of disseminating sectional times to their licensed data resellers.

Note that I said used at one time.

In looking at the actual data transmitted to both HDW and Brisnet I've noticed that the chart itself is accurate up to distances less than 10f only.

In actual practice, at distances of 10f to 13.5f fraction one and fraction two are the same as those shown on the chart for distances of 14f to 14.5f.

This means that for distances of 10f to 14.5f: Fraction one is at 6f and fraction two is at 8f.

The second chart is labeled Points of Call and shows the points of call in the race that Equibase uses for generating position and beaten lengths for each horse.

Note that for some of the race distances the points of call in this second chart that Equibase uses for determining the position and beaten lengths of each horse are different from the points of call in the first chart that Equibase uses for timing the race leader.

The info model described by these two charts is what figure makers rely on when they make speed and pace figs.

More on that below in the section about race distances of 5f to 5.5f.