Using the Data Window in sql mode, one of the tests that I subject my UDMs to is to break the data out by RGN. 
  RGN is a randomly generated number between 1 and 100 assigned to each starter by the Database Builder at the point in time when the StarterHistory table is populated.
  Below are two data samples that illustrate what I am talking about.
  The first data sample is a UDM from its development data set:
 
  query start:         3/8/2013 12:23:03 PM query end:           3/8/2013 12:23:53 PM elapsed time:        50 seconds ` Data Window Settings: Connected to: C:\JCapper\exe\JCapper2.mdb 999 Divisor  Odds Cap: None Betting Instructions: EU 0.85 ` UDM: Layer4_JacksOrBettor     --(Tagged as: Date Last Modified: 05-21-0212) ` SQL:  SELECT * FROM STARTERHISTORY       WHERE (UPR >= 75        AND (RANKUPR=1...  `       AND AGEOFHORSE >= 3        AND STARTSLIFETIME >= 4        AND RACEVOLATILITY >= 30        AND FIELDSIZE >= 6        AND DIST >= 880        AND PACEINDEX < 90        AND MLOR3 >= 1.65        AND MLOR2 >= .9        AND RANKMLINE BETWEEN 2 AND 9        AND MLINE >= 4.5)       AND [DATE] >= #01-21-2011#       AND [DATE] <= #05-20-2012#       ORDER BY [DATE], TRACK, RACE ` ` Data Summary          Win         Place          Show ----------------------------------------------------- Mutuel Totals     5877.10       4468.80       4086.60 Bet              -4172.00      -4172.00      -4172.00 ----------------------------------------------------- P/L               1705.10        296.80        -85.40 ` Wins                  410           697           959 Plays                2086          2086          2086 PCT                 .1965         .3341         .4597 ` ROI                1.4087        1.0711        0.9795 Avg Mut             14.33          6.41          4.26 ` ` By: RGN `   >=Min        < Max        P/L        Bet        Roi    Wins   Plays     Pct   Impact -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -999.00         5.00      90.70     162.00     1.5599      21      81   .2593   1.3191    5.00        10.00     178.80     244.00     1.7328      31     122   .2541   1.2928   10.00        15.00     143.30     232.00     1.6177      25     116   .2155   1.0965   15.00        20.00      89.80     174.00     1.5161      18      87   .2069   1.0526   20.00        25.00    -128.80     246.00     0.4764      10     123   .0813   0.4136   25.00        30.00      58.10     216.00     1.2690      21     108   .1944   0.9893   30.00        35.00      20.40     210.00     1.0971      15     105   .1429   0.7268   35.00        40.00     -21.50     188.00     0.8856      12      94   .1277   0.6495   40.00        45.00     207.80     172.00     2.2081      21      86   .2442   1.2424   45.00        50.00      -5.30     208.00     0.9745      17     104   .1635   0.8317   50.00        55.00     231.10     206.00     2.1218      24     103   .2330   1.1855   55.00        60.00     131.90     202.00     1.6530      25     101   .2475   1.2594   60.00        65.00     164.70     210.00     1.7843      25     105   .2381   1.2114   65.00        70.00     168.50     228.00     1.7390      24     114   .2105   1.0711   70.00        75.00      10.50     228.00     1.0461      18     114   .1579   0.8033   75.00        80.00      43.40     198.00     1.2192      18      99   .1818   0.9251   80.00        85.00      66.80     228.00     1.2930      22     114   .1930   0.9819   85.00        90.00     137.40     170.00     1.8082      22      85   .2588   1.3168   90.00        95.00      10.40     186.00     1.0559      16      93   .1720   0.8753   95.00    999999.00     107.10     264.00     1.4057      25     132   .1894   0.9636
 
 
 
 
  Note that in the above data sample, the RGN data is broken out in 20 separate rows - each row having an increment of 5 points each. Also note that 17 of the 20 rows (or 85%) are individually profitable. 
  Attempting to relate that to months - if live play were restricted to only those plays generated by the single UDM used in the above sample AND IF THE UDM'S ACTUAL PERFORMANCE DURING LIVE PLAY REMAINED ON PAR WITH THE PERFORANCE SEEN IN THE DEVELOPMENT SAMPLE, ADMITTEDLY A TALL ORDER: 
  Each month would have an (approximate) 85% chance of profitability. Put another way: The player's expectation would be an impressive 10.2 profitable months out of each 12 (something I have not personally been able to achieve.)
 
 
 
 
  Here is the same UDM run through the Data Window broken out by RGN... except this time, the time period of the sample is that after I began using the UDM to generate live plays:
 
       query start:         3/8/2013 12:38:39 PM      query end:           3/8/2013 12:39:00 PM      elapsed time:        21 seconds
       Data Window Settings:      Connected to: C:\JCapper\exe\JCapper2.mdb      999 Divisor  Odds Cap: None      Betting Instructions: EU 0.85
       UDM: Layer4_JacksOrBettor     --(Tagged as: Date Last Modified: 05-21-0212)
  SQL:  SELECT * FROM STARTERHISTORY       WHERE (UPR >= 75        AND (RANKUPR=1...  `       AND AGEOFHORSE >= 3        AND STARTSLIFETIME >= 4        AND RACEVOLATILITY >= 30        AND FIELDSIZE >= 6        AND DIST >= 880        AND PACEINDEX < 90        AND MLOR3 >= 1.65        AND MLOR2 >= .9        AND RANKMLINE BETWEEN 2 AND 9        AND MLINE >= 4.5)        AND [DATE] >= #05-21-2012#        ORDER BY [DATE], TRACK, RACE ` ` Data Summary          Win         Place          Show ----------------------------------------------------- Mutuel Totals     2761.50       2253.80       2073.30 Bet              -2394.00      -2394.00      -2394.00 ----------------------------------------------------- P/L                367.50       -140.20       -320.70 ` Wins                  221           381           523 Plays                1197          1197          1197 PCT                 .1846         .3183         .4369 ` ROI                1.1535        0.9414        0.8660 Avg Mut             12.50          5.92          3.96 ` ` By: RGN `   >=Min        < Max        P/L        Bet        Roi    Wins   Plays     Pct   Impact -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -999.00         5.00     -38.10      74.00     0.4851       5      37   .1351   0.7319    5.00        10.00       0.70     150.00     1.0047      12      75   .1600   0.8666   10.00        15.00       2.60     120.00     1.0217      10      60   .1667   0.9027   15.00        20.00      76.30     110.00     1.6936      13      55   .2364   1.2802   20.00        25.00       6.00     118.00     1.0508      14      59   .2373   1.2852   25.00        30.00      76.70     128.00     1.5992      15      64   .2344   1.2694   30.00        35.00       3.30      96.00     1.0344      10      48   .2083   1.1284   35.00        40.00     -37.00     112.00     0.6696       9      56   .1607   0.8705   40.00        45.00      70.10     138.00     1.5080      14      69   .2029   1.0990   45.00        50.00      79.00     120.00     1.6583      13      60   .2167   1.1735   50.00        55.00       3.80     128.00     1.0297      10      64   .1563   0.8463   55.00        60.00      -1.60     126.00     0.9873      11      63   .1746   0.9457   60.00        65.00      24.20     128.00     1.1891      10      64   .1563   0.8463   65.00        70.00      -2.80     134.00     0.9791      11      67   .1642   0.8892   70.00        75.00     -13.10     118.00     0.8890       7      59   .1186   0.6426   75.00        80.00       0.40     136.00     1.0029      11      68   .1618   0.8762   80.00        85.00      64.60      98.00     1.6592      13      49   .2653   1.4370   85.00        90.00      49.50     140.00     1.3536      16      70   .2286   1.2380   90.00        95.00      18.70      88.00     1.2125       8      44   .1818   0.9848   95.00    999999.00     -15.80     132.00     0.8803       9      66   .1364   0.7386
 
 
  Note that in the above data sample, the RGN data is broken out in 20 separate rows - each row having an increment of 5 points each. Also note that 14 of the 20 rows (or 70%) are individually profitable. 
  Attempting to relate that to months - if live play were restricted to only those plays generated by the single UDM used in the above sample - which this time reflects actual performance seen during live play: 
  Each month would have an (approximate) 70% chance of profitability. Put another way: The player's expectation would be (approximately) 8.4 profitable months out of each 12.
 
  Based on personal experience using my own UDMs, 8.4 months of profitable play out of each 12 is realistically achievable. 
  Ideally I would love to be profitable EVERY month - but the reality is I have never been able to achieve that.
 
 
 
 
  ~Edited by: jeff  on:  3/8/2013  at:  3:07:20 PM~
 
  |